‘Assault Weapons’ Myth Busted By Unlikely Source

Nothing will get a leftist more enraged than being proven wrong by one of their own.

But that’s what the liberal New York Times has done in a piece that completely destroys the myth of “assault weapons.”

The argument from the left is that we must have the “Assault Weapons Ban” reincarnated. Every year, some liberal lawmaker reintroduces another assault weapons bill, hoping to make it further than committee…but it rarely does, instead usually dying a quick death.

The truth is, of course, that so-called “assault weapons” are an invention of the left. The law – which effectively banned the sale of big scary rifles that aren’t responsible for most gun deaths – was in place from 1994 to 2004, and did literally nothing to reduce gun crime.

Now, even The New York Times is forced to admit that it’s not semiautomatic rifles that are responsible for America’s gun violence. In their article, they point out that of the tens of thousands of gun murders, only 322 were done with any kind of rifle in 2012.

The continuing focus on assault weapons stems from the media’s obsessive focus on mass shootings, which disproportionately involve weapons like the AR-15, a civilian version of the military M16 rifle. This, in turn, obscures some grim truths about who is really dying from gunshots.

Annually, 5,000 to 6,000 black men are murdered with guns. Black men amount to only 6 percent of the population. Yet of the 30 Americans on average shot to death each day, half are black males.

It was much the same in the early 1990s when Democrats created and then banned a category of guns they called “assault weapons.” America was then suffering from a spike in gun crime and it seemed like a problem threatening everyone. Gun murders each year had been climbing: 11,000, then 13,000, then 17,000.

So Democrats continue to push for a ban of what they think are the most dangerous gun in America: the “assault weapon.” These are guns with military-style features like a bayonet or a folding stock. But they account for less than 2 percent of all the gun crimes committed.

Read More

 


source: http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/assault-weapons-myth-busted-unlikely-source

  • JD522

    And they still didn’t disclose the real difference between military assault rifles and civilian weapons – the fact that the former are capable of fully automatic or burst fire and the latter AREN’T. This simple fact is omitted every time the scary “civilian assault rifle” is mentioned.

  • Sandman584

    There is no such thing as a assault rifle. The AR stands for Armlet Rifle, a manufacture of the rifle.

    • L Cavendish

      That would be Armalite

    • John Gillis

      Original manufacturer . Colt makes the best AR series .

  • gideonrockwell

    If you look at the history of firearms, every sporting arm began life as a military arm. It is the natural evolution of sporting arms. Avid hunters want accurate durable arms to go to the field with. Arms the military issue are built like Tonka Toys. They will take a beating, be exposed to rain, snow sand, mud and still work. This is what an avid shooter demands of his arms. Though we do not intentionally abuse our arms, when your in the tall uncut you never know what situation might arise, so we all want durable reliable arms. The 700 Remington, the 77 Ruger the old 742 Remington and many of the other arms we and our fathers and grandfathers carried to the field were all derived from military arms. The AR platform is the new generations sporting arm.